More complaints about standardized testing today. Surprise, surprise.
One of the ESL teachers was in the testing coordinator's room today, and he was saying how useless the tests were for his students, since the tests are not written to cater to students whose first language is not English. At this school, there are three levels of ESL students: A, who are *just* learning how to speak, B, who have a pretty good grasp of the language, and X, who know English well enough to be placed into mainstream curricula. This teacher said that the A students by definition should *not* pass the standardized tests. If they do, we have to move them up to B status and then they miss a year of instruction. Yet, their scores count against the school when they fail. Qua? In what universe does that make sense?
While this article does not relate to standardized testing, nor is it by Valerie (amazing! Even more amazing, it's by Jay Matthews, whom I normally detest, and while I'm still not a fan of his writing here, he does make a good point, and this probably should have been a completely separate sentence, but oh well)... it does relate to education policy as a whole, and states why politicians tend to generally ignore it.
This is the last week of testing. Then there are two more weeks of school, in which students will learn nothing and do nothing, because everything they did previously was so they would do well on the tests. So we're going to waste two weeks. Awesome.
No comments:
Post a Comment